mulberryshoots

"Tell me, what is it you plan to do with your one wild and precious life?" ~ Mary Oliver

adagio. . .


Here’s an interesting discovery I made after reading a novel by Rachel Cusk, a young British writer. (I seem to have artists from the UK in my frame of reference these days for some reason.) In her novel, “Bradshaw Variations,” Cusk describes a character playing an “Adagio” movement from a Beethoven sonata. Although the sonata is not revealed, I was curious enough from the novel’s description to page through my Henle edition of Beethoven’s 32 Sonatas in two thick volumes. As I did so, I sat down at my Steinway grand piano, named “Victor,” rebuilt years ago by my husband, “G”, and began to sightread through ALL of the Adagio movements. I discovered in the process that they are among the most melodic, beautiful compositions that are contained in this oeuvre (not knowing the plural for the word, “opus”!)

Anyhow, “Adagio” means “slowly.” An apt concept for how to spend days when it is so hot and humid outside (now under the heat dome that the weatherman keeps talking about) and as summer days languish. These gorgeous melodies also serve as a musical antidote to all the cleaning up and cleaning out that I’m still in the process of doing (“simplifying. . .”) I’m even thinking of playing (and possibly recording) a program of Adagios when my birthday rolls around next year, perhaps. Because the tempo is “slowly,” the melodies also offer up an opportunity to make beautiful music while not having to kill oneself technically to keep up at this point in my piano playing life.

To my amusement, I discovered that I was already practicing Bach’s D minor sonata whose first movement is marked “Adagio.” It serves primarily as a chordal introduction to a wonderful Fuge movement.

So, I’m blessedly happy, adagio-ing along and am glad to have discovered these wonderful pieces. And for my money, they put Mozart to shame–the Beethoven melodies meatier, more robust, evoking such sweet pathos. Yum!

being original. . .


I met someone this weekend who has done something original. Seeing her pottery was an eye-opener, not only because her works are so fresh and robust, but because they are also full of colorful glazes and whimsical brush strokes that enrich the spirit when you look at them. At least, that’s the kind of impact they have on me.

Over the years, I have been interested in, and collected pottery made by potters along the traditional lines of Bernard Leach and Shoji Hamada–anchors of British tradition in making pots–seminal pottery aesthetic and techniques learned in Japan, making symmetrical pieces glazed with zen-like brushstroke decoration. In the U.S., I’ve collected the work of Warren MacKenzie for its utilitarian, yet simple forms made by a modest and prodigious potter who is still going strong as he nears the age of ninety in Minnesota.

It seems in retrospect that the Holy Grail for making pottery has been to emulate this tradition of Anglo-Japanese pottery techniques, manifesting them in well-made (regular-shapes) in browns, tans and more earth tones.

What Sandy Brown has done is to transmute this tradition by means of her own creative spirit. While utilizing Japanese clay techniques (SB lived and studied pottery techniques in Japan for five years, thirty years ago) she has brought her soft, yet robust forms into playful realizations that are uplifting to look at and use. To me, she has found a space between the somewhat rigid traditions of Leach/Hamada/Mackenzie and jimmied open a place of light where color enters in and shapes become organic (a much overused word these days.) I read on-line that she is considered one of Britain’s pre-eiminent potters, with works exhibited at the Victoria and Albert Museum and other prestigious institutions all over the world.

I was blown away (not often for me) by how different and how true these pieces are because they resonate with and inspire me to look for that kind of originality in my own search for fulfillment as a writer.

Rigidity dominates in that arena as well–you have to follow certain rules to produce brown and tan writing that then has to go through a rigid, punishing process defined by the publishing industry as we now know it. But have you noticed that more and more people are “self-publishing?” In movies, there doesn’t seem to be the same kind of “vanity” taint that applies to self-published books. More actors are executive producers of their own work: Clint Eastwood, Tom Hanks, Laura Linney, Hilary Swank. It seems to be the only path to creating your own work, your way. Of course, you have to have what you believe is truly exceptional before you’ll put your own money and efforts in order to justify bringing it forth and promoting it.

In making pottery or writing books, there are experimenters who “do their own thing”–making pottery that may express themselves but hardly communicates or resonates with anybody else; or experimental writing that appears to be merely self-indulgent (e.g., David Foster Wallace). SOMEWHERE, there is a place to be original AND resonate message with others in a wholly new way: as colorful, whimsical and charming as these pottery pieces are, made by Sandy Brown.

Seeing these works of originality and their emergence in a previously brown pottery world of predictable shapes is an inspiration to keep going on the unlit path, seeking to be original. Artful without being indulgent. To open up the expected and humdrum sameness of what we are used to seeing and reading everywhere, and to let the color come through!

Thanks, Sandy Brown!

Click this link to see what I’m talking about!

simplifying. . .

We’re a few weeks into the summer and I’ve been making some headway toward getting things cleaned out (see previous post, “Holding On”.) Yesterday in the muggy heat, I gathered up all the CDs in their plastic holders and many not. I laid them out on the table according to composer and kind of music. Finding the right cases for the loose disks was like playing the game, “Memory,” and I’m relieved that mine seems to be holding its own.

I found a dozen favorite CDs that I hadn’t listened to in awhile: Mendelssohn cello pieces played by Steven Isserlis and Saint Saens piano concerti played by Stephen Hough. All bright, optimistic melodies from the 19th century. The set of Schubert sonatas played by Radu Lupu also made it into my iTunes library on my laptop. I discovered that I buy multiple recordings of the pieces I like in order to listen to different pianists perform them. For example, I have Bach’s Well-Tempered Clavichord recorded by Rosalyn Tureck, Angela Hewitt, Sviatislav Richter, Till Fellner and Glenn Gould. Ditto the Chopin Ballades by Maurizio Pollini, Claudio Arrau and Vladimir Ashkenazy. Beethoven late sonatas played by Alfred Brendel, Maurizio Pollini, and Claude Frank.

Today, I’m going through the rest of the books that I started to weed out last week. There are many books that I value that I don’t look at anymore. I haven’t wanted to just donate them anywhere because I’d like them to be available to others. So yesterday, I talked to someone at the Worcester Public Library who said they’d be happy to take them along with CDs. They also suggested donating books to the local vocational school libary–such as cookbooks. I’m glad these outlets are available for these remainders from my libraries. It allows my conscience to know that they may be part of someone else’s reading and listening life.

There are lots of books to sort through, similar to the task of going through all the CDs yesterday. The result though, is a renewed awareness of not only what I have and want to keep. But also a renewal in appreciating the music I’m going to listen to while I sort through the books, a stack of them growing beside my chair that I want to read the rest of the year.

So, simplifying has been enriching for me in ways I did not anticipate. Meanwhile, the house is stacked with cartons that make the place look like we’re getting ready to move out. When what we are doing this summer is getting ready to move on.

the glass still full. . .


I just got scammed. Okay, maybe that’s too harsh a word to put on it, but I was taken for a ride, at least. On a train named “Ego.” I met some people who complimented me on my writing: the blogs and my holdings about women needing to wake up to live their own lives, rather than waiting too long to do it.

Sometimes I can be over-generous. Naive in my desire to believe in people’s sincerity and goodwill. Well, this time it ended quickly. I’m disappointed but I learned my lesson. When people think your work is worthwhile, think again. It’s still what I think of it that matters in the end.

Putting ego aside, and after I got over feeling foolish, I asked myself what I thought about my work. And I’m happy to say that I still think it’s a worthwhile pursuit. I’m just going to give it a (big) rest!

And go and knit a new sweater. HaHa

being still. . .

Verse 19, taken from Red Pine’s translation of the Tao Te Ching:

“Get rid of wisdom and reason
and people will live a hundred times better
get rid of kindness and justice
and people once more will love and obey
get rid of cleverness and profit
and thieves will cease to exist
but these sayings are not enough
hence let this be added
wear the undyed and hold the uncarved
reduce self-interest and limit desires
get rid of learning and problems will vanish”

Today is independence day.
Maybe this inner alchemy is the Way.

reckoning. . .

Have you ever found yourself feeling bad about something and then taking it out on someone that you love? When we enter the ‘autumn of our years’ it’s possible to see that when you look homeward at your life up to now. For me, most of the time, it was because I felt neglected or ignored: that my feelings were dimmed out by the noise of what everyone else needed or wanted at the time. These occasions multiplied until a little core of regret formed, sometimes feeling not important enough or mattering less than everyone else around you.

Even so, it doesn’t excuse being thoughtless to others when there seems to be a general clueless cloud around this issue between us and others, especially if we’re mothers too. Otherwise, why would Hallmark have to work so hard on the messages when Mother’s Day rolls around each year?

It’s not too late to apologize, though, when an instant memory appears of an occasion when you could have been nicer or paid more attention instead of being rude or exhausted. I think it’s important to make our beds before we go. To smooth out the sheets and blankets of the past and to be able to lie in the bed we make for ourselves with a clear conscience. There are also some, a very few, for whom reaching out isn’t all that apparent anymore. For those, it’s better to just let it go rather than feeling any regrets because it doesn’t do any good, only harm…a dynamic that goes so far back that it isn’t worth remembering really. All of us have some of this kind of pain, I think. It’s how we handle it that offers us a way out for consolation of some kind. A reckoning of sorts that we take charge of for ourselves before it’s too late.

Hard to go through. But better afterwards, little by little.

the camel and the straw. . .

Do you ever get antsy about the normal way your day goes? I saw this photo of an Egyptian camel that my daughter Caitlin took in my photo file and couldn’t resist putting it up. His expression was so sanguine–as though chewing straw or something tasty like that.

I’ve been feeling like that lately too. You know that saying about the straw that broke the camel’s back? Let’s just step back from that. Sometimes people get crispy and have meltdowns. Often, it has nothing to do with you or me. Just let it go and don’t take it personally. Their angst doesn’t belong to us and we don’t have to rush in and try to fix their problems either. There’s a lot of free-floating angst out there, it seems.

Meanwhile, this camel looked so contented that I thought it would be fun to shift the paradigm about camels and their backs being broken to one of retreat within ourselves and being still.

who’s who . . .

What accounts for how we turn out? Brothers and sisters within a family can be very similar, or one may stand out among them as being very different in appearance or bent of mind. Some may have the benefit of education, either formal or informal. Others don’t want to listen to anyone else, in books or not. How much does our personality influence the mix. Ancestral genes? Does karma, destiny or fate have a role to play?

So many potential factors above. It’s hard to sort out what makes us be like others and what makes us be more like ourselves. We live in a materialistic world. Yet, spiritual writings want us to believe that simplifying and not wanting more is the way to go. Who’s in charge of us? Very confusing.

pairs. . .

I’ve been thinking about pairs recently. Whom we pair off with mostly.

Compatability is something that’s often raised to explain why people find each other. You can see that when you look around you. Shared abilities and interests such as listening to music and picking up similarities in what you each hear. A lifestyle and aesthetic that is easy going because you intuitively like the same things. Such as living in a home that you don’t like to leave for very long. Pride of place. Eating dinner together every night, listening to the evening news and watching the sun set.

In the I-Ching, there are Wanderers, who never stay in one place for long. My first husband was a Wanderer. Since we parted, he has done exactly that–taken job postings with his wife in places like Morocco, Georgia (the country, not the state). I know others who travel all the time and seem not to be able to sit still in one place. Where is home for them?

One of the great wonders of the Western World is what time teaches us. Whatever it is, one thing is clear–we have NO IDEA what is in store for us when we are young. Or middle-aged. Or later on either, for that matter. It’s a mystery all the way, it seems. That’s also what’s fun about it if we can have a sense of humor about how things turn out.

holding on . . .

As time goes by, I find myself needing less and less. Just the dishes that I love. Fewer cooking pots, a small, black Le Creuset saucepan with a wooden handle to boil my breakfast egg. Sea salt and coarsely ground pepper from a mill.

I read once that a woman who was turning one hundred years old had reduced her worldly goods down to four boxes. That seemed very responsible and very Zen to me. I am thinking about how I might pare down what I have. To stop buying more. Not because I am afraid of growing older. Simply because it makes things more simple. Less to manage. Making living lighter. And holding on just to what I treasure.

My process is unlike re-organizing or de-cluttering. That somehow feels like there’s a mess and it needs cleaning up. Rather, I pick up and keep only what I truly want to hold on to. My favorite teapot. Yorkshire and Lapsang Souchang tea. Clothes that fit into a soft carryall, enough to take a trip for a week or to wear everyday forever.

Even though I have a small box of earrings, I usually wear one pair all the time, sometimes alternating with one or two others. But that’s about all.

The summer lies ahead. A great time to think about how everything else could be used by someone who might enjoy it. There might be boxes too numerous to count but manageable to disperse by the Fall.

Holding onto a few things feels good. Better get started soon.